Activists in San Francisco have come with a new, yet simple, way to stop driverless cars after deadly incidents and headaches caused by autonomous vehicles.
The protest group Safe Streets Rebel, which advocates for pedestrian safety, has posted multiple videos to their social media platforms showing them disabling the robo-taxis by placing a traffic cone on the hood.
The move comes after robotic vehicles were blamed for a string of incidents, including the killing of a dog in June and plowing into the side of a bus in March.
The campaign is timed to coincide with the California public utilities commission’s vote to expand driverless car services. The two primary robo-taxi companies are Cruise, owned by General Motors, and Waymo, owned by Google.
On Instagram, Safe Streets Rebel called the campaign The Week of Cone. ‘It’s a great time. We’re not damaging anyone’s property, it’s very fixable, but it is a funny and effective tactic that has really resonated,’ a member of the group told The Guardian.
If you come across a Waymo or Cruise car this week, you may see this. A group in SF called Safe Street Rebel is placing cones on these cars, which disables them. They are doing it to protest the CPUC vote next week that could expand AVs in The City. @abc7newsbayarea pic.twitter.com/zc8hb0wCzZ
— Ryan Curry (@RyanCurryTV) July 7, 2023
The cone tricks the vehicle’s sensors to believe there is an obstacle ahead, causing the ride to stop.
In a statement, Waymo has decried the protesters calling their actions ‘vandalism’ and accused the group’s members of encouraging ‘unsafe and disrespectful behavior on our roadways.’ The company promised to call the authorities if they became aware of tampering with cars.
Cruise highlighted its public service in a statement on the cone protest.
‘Cruises fleet provides free rides to late-night service workers without reliable transportation options, has delivered over 2 million meals to food insecure San Franciscans, and recovers food waste from local businesses.
‘Intentionally obstructing vehicles gets in the way of those efforts and risks creating traffic congestion for local residents,’ the press release continued.
KRON reported city officials have also spoke out against the protest, pointing to the fact that if a car is disabled, it requires tech experts to reset it, potentially causing more congestion.
Cruise also argued its cars have not been involved in a single fatality or serious injury after accumulating 3 million miles on San Francisco streets.
Safe Streets Rebel seeks to make public areas safer for pedestrians and cyclists while also campaigning for more funding to mass transit. The targeting of robo-cars is a new departure for the group, its previous targets were human drivers.
Last month, the group made headlines over a protest of cut in public transport funding that included a member dressed as California Governor Gavin Newsom beating a piñata, reports the San Francisco Standard.
‘They still require wide roads, tire wear, they have cameras everywhere. It’s not just about ‘are they safer than a human diver?’ We want healthy cities that don’t require these high-tech surveillance pods moving around,’ an activist told The Guardian.
In an interview with ABC San Francisco, another member of the group said: ‘Even if you have the perfect driver ,which is what these are pitched as, there are still fundamentally unsafe as a two-ton metal box moving through the city.’
Safe Streets Rebels’ concerns have been echoed by San Francisco Police Chief Jeanine Nicholson who has urged officials to move slower in allowing more driverless cars more freedom on the streets.
‘We’ve had two vehicles actually stop dead in front of fire engines trying to get out the door of fire stations to go on emergency calls,’ Chief Nicholson told KTVU.
In June, a Cruise car was accused of blocking emergency service vehicles’ access to the scene of a shooting. Also in June, two Waymo cars stalled close to the city’s Pride Parade.
Autonomous car expert Billy Riggs of the University of San Francisco told KTVU that data shows driverless cars are safer than human drivers.
‘We still see issues where, just like a human driver, they encounter situations, one in a million situations that they haven’t encountered before,’ Riggs said.
The cone protest is scheduled to end on July 9, but one protester told the Standard that coning has become so popular, it may have taken on a life of its own.
‘People might just keep coning them, if not as a form of protest then just for joy,’ the activist said.
Waymo, which began as a secret project within Google in 2009, has been running a driverless ride-hailing service in the Phoenix area since October 2020, but navigating the density and difficulty of more congested cities such as San Francisco has posed more daunting challenges for robotic taxis to overcome.
That’s one of the reasons Cruise’s newly approved driverless service in San Francisco is being so tightly controlled. Besides being restricted to places and times where there is less traffic and fewer pedestrians on the streets, Cruise’s driverless service won’t be allowed to operate in heavy rain or fog.
While Cruise’s application for a driverless taxi service in San Francisco won widespread backing from supporters hoping the technology will become viable in other cities, some transportation experts urged the Public Utilities Commission to move cautiously.
‘Many of the claimed benefits of (autonomous vehicles) have not been demonstrated, and some claims have little or no foundation,’ Ryan Russo, the director of the transportation department in Oakland, California, told the commission in May.
Uber, the biggest ride-hailing service, had hoped to have 75,000 self-driving cars on the road by 2019 and operate a driverless taxi fleet in at least 13 cities in 2022, according to court documents filed in a high-profile case accusing the company of stealing trade secrets from Waymo.
Uber wound up selling its autonomous driving division to Aurora in 2020 and still relies almost exclusively on human drivers who have been more difficult to recruit since the pandemic.
And Tesla CEO Elon Musk promised his electric car company would be running a robotic taxi fleet by the end of 2020. That didn’t happen, although Musk is still promising it eventually will.
Safe Street Rebel…The streets of SF are much more dangerous than a self-driving car. Maybe We could have a car that fires artillery at the junkies…How about a construction water truck to clean the streets and people. Make the streets safe again.